Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site abnji.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!spuxll!abnji!nyssa
From: nyssa@abnji.UUCP (nyssa of traken)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper.
Message-ID: <681@abnji.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Jun-85 07:44:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: abnji.681
Posted: Wed Jun 12 07:44:54 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Jun-85 00:14:37 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <983@ulysses.UUCP>, <1854@ukma.UUCP>
Organization: Terminus Hospital, Incorporated
Lines: 32

>	Aww, did big bad Scott offend little Stevie? Well, TOO FUCKING BAD!
>This is (altogether now...) NET FLAME!!!!

It was also cross posted to net.women.  Is that an appropriate forum
for childish insults?

>      					    If Scott wants to refer to
>Jeanette's anatomy in a non-flattering way, FINE. He has every right to
>do so! If Scott wants to proudly extoll the virtues of the male sex organ,
>FINE, he can use whatever words he wants to do so!

If Jeanette feels offended by those references, she has every right to
sue (admittedly, I personally wouldn't be so offended, but I am not 
Jeanette).  Libel is still illegal, even if this is net.flame.  How
long do you think backbone sites will forward news if there is a libel
suit resulting from a net posting?  (Many are already dismayed with
the volume, anyway, and any excuse...)

>	If you don't like the way things are said in (altogether now..)
>NET.FLAME,
>		DON'T READ THE GROUP THEN!!!

And what about net.women?  And other inappropriate cross postings?
How many net.flame articles are cross referenced to other groups?

>gees, some people are soooo touchy...

And some people don't think before they post...
-- 
James C Armstrong, Jnr.   ihnp4!abnji!nyssa

I have not come as your prisoner, Davros, but as your executioner.