Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc12.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc12!wa371
From: wa371@sdcc12.UUCP (Senior Dwarf)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper.
Message-ID: <371@sdcc12.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Jun-85 01:52:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcc12.371
Posted: Wed Jun 12 01:52:06 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Jun-85 06:00:24 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <1579@amdcad.UUCP>
Organization: Snow White's Electronic Cottage, San Diego
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.flame:10513 net.women:5796
Summary: why use a mile is a meter will do?

> >It makes more sense to wrap
> >them in toilet paper than to get blood all over the trash can (and
> >have to wash it every month "It's really disgusting, dried blood.").

Blood is the color of life.  And life is not disgusting--or is it?

> My sisters gift-wrap them as they were taught by their
> mother. "It wouldn't do for boys to see them. They might ask what they were."

Right on!  Boys should be kept ignorant about and alienated from girls.

But do napkins have to be wrapped in miles of toilet paper when two layers
will do as well? 
Women, of the world, mend your ways, or one of these days
we will have a toilet paper crisis.  :-)

Cheers,
Bernd <bear-nd>           *** hooray for USENET ***
UUCP: ...!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc12!wa371,   ARPA: sdcsvax!sdcc12!wa371@nosc