Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site SCINEWS.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!mcnc!rti-sel!SCINEWS!todd
From: todd@SCINEWS.UUCP (Todd Jones)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper.
Message-ID: <138@SCINEWS.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Jun-85 19:13:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: SCINEWS.138
Posted: Fri Jun 14 19:13:04 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Jun-85 03:15:07 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <1579@amdcad.UUCP> <371@sdcc12.UUCP>
Organization: SCI Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lines: 26
Xref: watmath net.flame:10616 net.women:5917

> > >It makes more sense to wrap
> > >them in toilet paper than to get blood all over the trash can (and
> > >have to wash it every month "It's really disgusting, dried blood.").
> 
> Blood is the color of life.  And life is not disgusting--or is it?

Not only can life be disgusting, it can smell awful!

> 
> > My sisters gift-wrap them as they were taught by their
> > mother. "It wouldn't do for boys to see them. They might ask what they were."
> 
> Right on!  Boys should be kept ignorant about and alienated from girls.


> 
> But do napkins have to be wrapped in miles of toilet paper when two layers
> will do as well? 
> Women, of the world, mend your ways, or one of these days
> we will have a toilet paper crisis.  :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Bernd <bear-nd>           *** hooray for USENET ***
> UUCP: ...!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc12!wa371,   ARPA: sdcsvax!sdcc12!wa371@nosc

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***