Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihlpl!zubbie
From: zubbie@ihlpl.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.flame
Subject: Re: Women/men and the consumption of toilet paper
Message-ID: <170@ihlpl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Jun-85 12:50:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihlpl.170
Posted: Thu Jun 20 12:50:20 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Jun-85 01:05:40 EDT
References: <464@ttidcc.UUCP> <465@gitpyr.UUCP> <952@mhuxt.UUCP> <141@SCINEWS.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 36
Xref: watmath net.women:5962 net.flame:10649

> Fair or not, women can find men(?) to sate their lust easier than
> vice versa. (Or maybe I had the wrong opening lines!)
> 
> The preceding opinions are, in all likelihood, those of Todd Jones.
> 
> FLAME ME IF YOU DARE!

No flame but a definite statement that this is a lot of bull.

The assumptions evident in this statement are very indicative of the
steretyped concept that women are merely sexual tools placed on this
earth for mens amusement. The concept of sexual freedom does not imply
that women can just go out and "sate their lust" as they please. 
Considering the state of things today it is actually more difficult for
a woman because of:

	a) the danger or chance of being raped.

	b) the state of society which labels as despicable the morals
		of any woman who is obviously out for a roll in the hay.

	c) Men are allowed this freedom of action without any great amount
		of public antipathy.

I admit it would be a nice situation , even ideal, but today, in this country
or most others I have heard of, it is simply untrue.

jeanette l. zobjeck
ihnp4!ihlpl!zubbie


================================================================================
From the mostly vacant environment of my subconscious
join me if you dare.

============================================================================