Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site mtxinu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!gymble!lll-crg!dual!unisoft!mtxinu!ed
From: ed@mtxinu.UUCP (Ed Gould)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper.
Message-ID: <415@mtxinu.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 19-Jun-85 20:46:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: mtxinu.415
Posted: Wed Jun 19 20:46:01 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Jun-85 01:31:56 EDT
References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <983@ulysses.UUCP> <1854@ukma.UUCP>
Reply-To: ed@mtxinu.UUCP (Ed Gould)
Organization: mt Xinu, Berkeley, CA
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.flame:10676 net.women:5986

In article <1854@ukma.UUCP> edward@ukma.UUCP (Edward C. Bennett) writes:
>
>	Aww, did big bad Scott offend little Stevie? Well, TOO FUCKING BAD!
>This is (altogether now...) NET FLAME!!!! ...
>
>	If you don't like the way things are said in (altogether now..)
>NET.FLAME,
>		DON'T READ THE GROUP THEN!!!

I don't, but I still see this kind of drivel.  Note the "Newsgroups:"
line in the header:

	Newsgroups: net.flame,net.women

This stuff is also in net.women.

Now, *FLAME ON* before you berate someone for inappropriate postings
engage your own brain and look at what *you're* doing.  I couldn't
care less what shows up in net.flame, or how it's phrased.  In other
groups, a modicum of decorum is expected.  Scott showed none. *FLAME OFF*

-- 
Ed Gould		    mt Xinu, 2910 Seventh St., Berkeley, CA  94710  USA
{ucbvax,decvax}!mtxinu!ed   +1 415 644 0146