Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/3/85; site ukma.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!edward From: edward@ukma.UUCP (Edward C. Bennett) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Re: Women and the consumption of toilet paper. Message-ID: <1898@ukma.UUCP> Date: Sun, 23-Jun-85 13:17:08 EDT Article-I.D.: ukma.1898 Posted: Sun Jun 23 13:17:08 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 24-Jun-85 06:24:11 EDT References: <302@sdcc12.UUCP> <2484@randvax.UUCP> <1417@amdcad.UUCP> <233@luke.UUCP> Organization: U of Kentucky, Mathematical Sciences, Lexington KY Lines: 38 In article <233@luke.UUCP>, sml@luke.UUCP (Steven List) writes: > > BTW - you have just about the largest, most obtrusive signature in the > net (that I've seen, anyway). If you think my .signature is large you are showing your ignorance. They are many .signatures much larger than mine (though there admittedly less frequent). Instead of whining about a 10 line .signature, why not flame the people who include and ENTIRE 76 line article and add ONE line of their own commentary at the end? Talk about a waste!! > Thank you SOOOOOO much for reminding us over > and over and over (at excessive cost) that you are a handicap [sic]. Who said anything about my being a handicap? I'm simply promoting a good cause! So what if I am anyway?! Where do get off trying to imply that someone using a wheelchair is incapable of writing acceptable articles?! Just because your legs work, why does that make you any better than someone who can't walk?! Or are you one of those people who shun the handicapped because you're afraid of them?! People are people! Everybody deserves an even break! (Shades of the AA discussion here) I now present a shortened .signature. 8 lines, 247 characters. -- edward {decvax,ihnp4,mhuxt,seismo}! -+-> cbosgd! --> ukma!edward () {clyde,osu-eddie,ulysses}! ---| | |-- "Well, what's on the television then?" /|--- "Looks like a penguin." | \ _ \___/ \= Support barrier free design