Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site psuvax1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cadre!psuvax1!ian From: ian@psuvax1.UUCP (Ian Parberry) Newsgroups: net.math Subject: Re: Euler's(?) formula Message-ID: <1662@psuvax1.UUCP> Date: Mon, 17-Jun-85 15:31:19 EDT Article-I.D.: psuvax1.1662 Posted: Mon Jun 17 15:31:19 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 20-Jun-85 20:46:06 EDT References: <1832@ut-ngp.UTEXAS> Reply-To: ian@psuvax1.UUCP (Ian Parberry) Distribution: net Organization: Pennsylvania State Univ. Lines: 28 One of the cutest proofs of Euler's formula that I have seen is the following, paraphrased from Street and Wallis, "Combinatorial theory: an Introduction", CBRC, 1977, p. 430. Theorem 2. Suppose that a plane representation of a connected planar simple graph has v vertices, e edges and f faces. Then v-e+f=2. (1) Proof. By induction on e. It is easy to see that the theorem is true when e is small: if e=0, then the graph must consist of 1 vertex, which means f=1; if e=1 or e=2 we have a path with e+1 vertices and one face. Now assume the theorem is true for all graphs with E or less edges, and suppose e=E+1. It may be that the graph is a tree. In that case, v=e+1 and f=1, so that v-e+f=e+1-e+1=2. Otherwise, the graph has a subgraph which is a cycle. Select an edge which lies in a cycle. That edge will lie separating 2 faces (possibly one being the exterior face). If such an edge is deleted, we obtain a graph with one fewer edge and one fewer faces than the original. It has E edges so, by induction, equation (1) is satisfied; in terms of the original graph, v-(e-1)+(f-1) = 2, and (1) follows. QED Combined with theorem 1 ("the graph corresponding to a convex polyhedron is planar") this gives the result you seek. Theorem 1 does have a short proof, which can be found in the above reference or sought out by the curious.