Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site persci.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tikal!cholula!persci!bill
From: bill@persci.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.lang.c,net.micro,net.micro.pc,net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: 286 vs. 68k (New Newsgroup Proposal)
Message-ID: <182@persci.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Jun-85 15:02:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: persci.182
Posted: Tue Jun  4 15:02:34 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 08:34:34 EDT
References: <675@dataio.UUCP>
Organization: Personal Scientific, Woodinville WA
Lines: 15
Keywords: Intel Motorola NS slug-it-out
Xref: watmath net.arch:1321 net.lang.c:5349 net.micro:10678 net.micro.pc:4145 net.micro.68k:870
Summary: Please create a new newsgroup to argue uP relative merits.

>Enough is enough!!!
>
>I propose that we start a new newsgroup "net.micro.68vs286" so that
>all you people who enjoy discussing benchmarks, registers, segments,
>clock cycles and other marketing hype can do so away from the rest of
>us.  I am member of the user community, not the argueing community.
>
>					Bjorn Benson
>					..!uw-beaver!entropy!dataio!bjorn
I second the motion!! I am just about ready to unsubscribe from this group.
(Perhaps it should be called net.flame.micro :-)


-- 
Bill Swan 	{ihnp4,decvax,allegra,...}!uw-beaver!tikal!persci!bill