Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site terak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!hao!noao!terak!doug
From: doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.68k,net.micro.16k
Subject: Re: Integrated MMUs versus separate ones
Message-ID: <542@terak.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 10-May-85 20:01:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: terak.542
Posted: Fri May 10 20:01:52 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 04:27:17 EDT
References: <259@petfe.UUCP> <1277@amdcad.UUCP> <2168@sun.uucp>
Organization: Terak Corporation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Lines: 10

> Out of curiosity, is anyone building National xx0xx based systems
> using any MMU except the National MMU?  Or was it good enough that it
> stuck as a standard?

The NatSemi MMU interface is tailored so specifically to the 32082 MMU
chip that if you tried to build a custom MMU, you'd basically end up
with a functional duplicate of the '082.  The '082 is tolerable, so...
-- 
Doug Pardee -- Terak Corp. -- !{ihnp4,seismo,decvax}!noao!terak!doug
               ^^^^^--- soon to be CalComp