Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cyb-eng.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!cositex!cyb-eng!bc
From: bc@cyb-eng.UUCP (Bill Crews)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.micro,net.micro.pc,net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need 286 "C" benchmark
Message-ID: <571@cyb-eng.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Jun-85 17:27:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: cyb-eng.571
Posted: Fri Jun 14 17:27:25 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Jun-85 01:34:43 EDT
References: <426@oakhill.UUCP> <8745@microsoft.UUCP>
Organization: Cyb Systems, Austin, TX
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.arch:1390 net.micro:10787 net.micro.pc:4268 net.micro.68k:916

> Can someone tell me what the advantages of a segmented architechture is over
> an equally efficient architechture based on "traditional" memory management.
> Are these advantages worth the cost in both chip space and program complexity?

Hopefully, no one will.  This discussion has been agonizing.

-- 

  /  \    Bill Crews
 ( bc )   Cyb Systems, Inc
  \__/    Austin, Texas

[ gatech | ihnp4 | nbires | seismo | ucb-vax ] ! ut-sally ! cyb-eng ! bc