Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekecs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!tekecs!paulsc
From: paulsc@tekecs.UUCP (Paul Scherf)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.micro,net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: 286 vs. 68k
Message-ID: <5458@tekecs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 16-Jun-85 20:20:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekecs.5458
Posted: Sun Jun 16 20:20:06 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Jun-85 04:36:52 EDT
References: <675@dataio.UUCP> <175@stl.UUCP> <127@peregrine.UUCP> <681@dataio.UUCP>
Reply-To: paulsc@tekecs.UUCP (Paul Scherf)
Followup-To: net.arch
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 12
Keywords: Intel, Motorola
Xref: watmath net.arch:1403 net.micro:10800 net.micro.68k:925

I think I'd rather see the (heated) articles about 286 vs. 68k,
than all the articles about whether to start a new group for it.
Isn't there a group (net.news.group?) for discussing new group
creation?

If all the people who are complaining about the 286 vs. 68k
articles spent that effort learning about awk, each one of them
by now could have their very own program for preprocessing the
news and marking as read all articles with a '6' and a '8' in
either order.

Paul Scherf, Tektronix, Wilsonville, Oregon, USA, paulsc@radio_flyer.TEK.UUCP