Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site oakhill.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!oakhill!davet From: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Newsgroups: net.micro.68k Subject: Re: Re: 68020 benchmarks?? (disbelieve Intel) Message-ID: <446@oakhill.UUCP> Date: Fri, 7-Jun-85 01:56:50 EDT Article-I.D.: oakhill.446 Posted: Fri Jun 7 01:56:50 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Jun-85 03:45:17 EDT References: <155@soph.UUCP> <> <157@soph.UUCP> <594@intelca.UUCP> Reply-To: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Organization: Motorola Inc. Austin, Tx Lines: 28 In article <594@intelca.UUCP> clif@intelca.UUCP (Clif Purkiser) writes: >> >> In article <> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes: >> >> > >> > Gosh, how could a 6 MHz 80286 do as good as a 12 MHz 68010? >> >> Ummm ... what are you talking about? There is *no such part* as >> a 12 MHz 68010. Let's not spread any misinformation here ... >> you are drawing some flakey conclusions from those numbers I put >> out. >> > >If there is no 12 MHZ 68010, why does Mot claim that a 16.6MHz 68020 is >2.5x performance of a 12 Mhz 68010? > My my, Phil. Where did you come up with your information? We have been shipping 12.5 Megahertz parts for over a year now. Several systems have been using them such as HP, Charles River Data Systems, Wicat, Tektronix, ... the list goes on. Look on your local distributer's shelf in the last year? How about giving me a penny for every 12.5 Megahertz MC68000 or MC68010 we've shipped to make amends? :-) Motorola Semiconductor Inc. Dave Trissel Austin, Texas {ihnp4,seismo}!ut-sally!oakhill!davet