Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn <gwyn>)
Newsgroups: net.micro.att
Subject: Re: AT&T Micro Anouncement
Message-ID: <11258@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 9-Jun-85 00:51:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.11258
Posted: Sun Jun  9 00:51:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 08:25:55 EDT
References: <453@rtech.UUCP> <624@houxu.UUCP> <368@petrus.UUCP> <1087@ihuxn.UUCP> <372@petrus.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 7

Come on, guys, this arguing accomplishes nothing useful.
Neither the $15 chip nor the $400 chip can do doodly-squat
without a substantial investment in additional electronics.
A better topic for discussion would be:  How capable is a
minimum system configuration built around the chip set,
how capable is a maximal system using the chip set, and
what are the probable manufacturing costs of such systems?