Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!oacb2
From: oacb2@ut-ngp.UUCP (oacb2)
Newsgroups: net.micro.cpm
Subject: Re: Re: EMACS for CP/M, MINCE, and SCRIBBLE
Message-ID: <1784@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Jun-85 12:04:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1784
Posted: Tue Jun  4 12:04:24 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 06:41:16 EDT
References: <11196@brl-tgr.ARPA> <596@intelca.UUCP>
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 8

> However, Mince could handle files larger than 64K wheras Perfect Writer
> didn't seem to. Even with a huge >128K swap file.

I often use Perfect Writer with files larger than 64K.  I think the largest
I've ever edited with it is about 180K.  I use a 248K swap file.
-- 

	Mike Rubenstein, OACB, UT Medical Branch, Galveston TX 77550