Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!eirikur
From: eirikur@amber.DEC (Eirikur Hallgrimsson)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac
Subject: 512 upgrade vs rumored hardware upgrade
Message-ID: <2611@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Jun-85 10:23:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.2611
Posted: Tue Jun 11 10:23:39 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Jun-85 01:41:44 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 19

I just received my Mac (won it from the EE Times advertisment--
preference drawing).  Came as a vanilla 128K machine. I'm having to 
re-learn a lot about disk configurations, work-styles, etc, since I 
have used only the 512K systems in the past.  

Question:  If I buy the 512K upgrade from Apple, will I be able to
retain that investment, even if I go for the ROM + hardware upgrade
that is rumored?  Ie, will the hardware upgrade allow more memory,
but not using compatible chips?  If so, maybe I should live with my
skinny Mac for a while.

	Thanks,

	Eirikur Hallgrimsson

	...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!eirikur

Posted:	Tue 11-Jun-1985 10:20 Marlborough uncorrected time.
To:	RHEA::DECWRL::"net.micro.mac"