Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: Xenix boot patches
Message-ID: <1559@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 8-Jun-85 21:40:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.1559
Posted: Sat Jun  8 21:40:25 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 07:22:49 EDT
References: <264@tellab3.UUCP>
Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 13

In article <264@tellab3.UUCP> steve@tellab3.UUCP (& Harpster) writes:
>I hope this helps.  I know it was incredibly frustrating to me.  I got
>4.2 BSD up faster on our VAXes than Xenix on our AT.  The Xenix documentation
>is horrible.  They always assume that the boot will go flawlessly.

My AT Xenix boot went flawlessly. What's all the fuss about? Did I
miss something?
-- 
 People do what management inspects, not what management expects.

 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA