Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-sem.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!grkermi!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!brl-sem!abc
From: abc@brl-sem.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: Why the vax, but not the Unix??
Message-ID: <345@brl-sem.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 7-Jun-85 16:07:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-sem.345
Posted: Fri Jun  7 16:07:33 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Jun-85 23:40:28 EDT
References: <27400001@gypsy.UUCP> <546@hou2b.UUCP> <11250@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Reply-To: abc@brl-sem (SECAD/CSMB) <abc>.ARPA (Brint Cooper (SECAD/CSMB) <abc>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 9

To add to what Ron said, for whatever reasons, computers seem
to take the article, software in geneal does not.

Thus a probram runs under (VMS, UNIX, RT-11, EXEC-8) on the
(1180, VAX, ENIAC, TRS-80).  The reason may have to do with
the evolution of operating systems as software to support
programing in languages.  Now,that goes 'way back; se never
wrote in The English, The Franch, etc.
Brint