Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!padraig
From: padraig@utastro.UUCP (Padraig Houlahan)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Brawk! Polly want a cracker!
Message-ID: <196@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Jun-85 22:06:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: utastro.196
Posted: Wed Jun  5 22:06:37 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Jun-85 23:49:10 EDT
References: <183@utastro.UUCP> <188@utastro.UUCP> <1188@uwmacc.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX
Lines: 19

Regarding  the 116 "proofs" for creationism, Paul DuBois writes:

> (ii) The postings have generated a substantial amount of discussion and
> I personally feel that a certain amount of it has been worthwhile.  I
> am quite interested in the evolutionary response.  Therefore I am
> hopeful that the "n" key will not be used.  I am guessing, but I think
> Dr. Brown may view the net as a useful tool for getting feedback from
> evolutionists.
> 
> -- 
>                                                                     |
> Paul DuBois     {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois        --+--

Perhaps you could elaborate on which parts have been worthwhile? How
about the criticism that you cannot prove creationism by disproving
evolution? Where's the discussion? There has been no defense of their
postings in the light of the responses they generated.

Padraig Houlahan.