Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cybvax0.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!zehntel!dual!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh
From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 13)
Message-ID: <527@cybvax0.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-May-85 13:56:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: cybvax0.527
Posted: Thu May  9 13:56:11 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 05:34:55 EDT
References: <350@iham1.UUCP>
Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz)
Distribution: net
Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Lines: 24

In article <350@iham1.UUCP> rck@iham1.UUCP (Ron Kukuk) writes:
>     C.  NEW RESEARCH SHOWS THAT  THE  REQUIREMENTS  FOR  LIFE  ARE  SO
>         COMPLEX  THAT CHANCE AND EVEN BILLIONS OF YEARS CANNOT EXPLAIN
>         IT.
> 
>        25.  If the earth, early in its alleged evolution,  HAD  OXYGEN
>             in  its  atmosphere,  the  chemicals needed for life would
>             have been removed by oxidation. But if there had  been  NO
>             OXYGEN,  then  there would have been no ozone in the upper
>             atmosphere. Without  this  ozone  life  would  be  quickly
>             destroyed  by  the  sun's ultraviolet radiation [a,b]. The
>             only way for both ozone and life to be here is for both to
>             come   into  existence  simultaneously.  In  other  words,
>             Creation!

If Kulak, Brown, and Gish saw their own shadows, would they go back
underground?

Ultraviolet could be shaded by any rock or clouds, or filtered by water.
Thus, any life-forming chemicals could accumulate after production by
UV, lightning, or heat.
-- 

Mike Huybensz		...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh