Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-edu1!rafferty
From: rafferty@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Colin Rafferty)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case For Creationism (Part 23)
Message-ID: <349@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA>
Date: Sat, 8-Jun-85 02:11:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-e.349
Posted: Sat Jun  8 02:11:03 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Jun-85 02:48:26 EDT
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 16

>
>       36.  Detailed studies of various animals have revealed  certain
>            physical   equipment   and  capabilities  that  cannot  be
>            duplicated by the world's best designers  using  the  most
>            sophisticated technologies. For example...

Well, now we know that Man did not create the Universe.  That sure as heck
proves God did. (note intense sarcasm)

----
            Colin Rafferty { Math Department, Carnegie-Mellon University }

"According to convention there is a sweet and a bitter, a hot and a cold,
and according to convention, there is an order.  In truth, there are atoms
and a void."
                -Democritus(400 B.C.)