Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sphinx.UChicago.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!beth
From: beth@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (Beth Christy)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 26)
Message-ID: <703@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 19-Jun-85 21:49:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: sphinx.703
Posted: Wed Jun 19 21:49:11 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Jun-85 15:20:18 EDT
References: <375@iham1.UUCP>
Organization: U. Chicago - Computation Center
Lines: 19

From: rck@iham1.UUCP (Ron Kukuk), Message-ID: <375@iham1.UUCP>:
>       43.  Saturn's  rings   could   not   have   formed   from   the
>            disintegration  of  a former satellite or from the capture
>            of external material; the particles in these rings are too
>            small  and  too  evenly distributed throughout orbits that
>            are too  circular.  Therefore,  the  rings  appear  to  be
>            remnants of Saturn's creation.
>
>				Ron Kukuk
>				Walt Brown

Umm, why exactly did the creator leave "remnants" scattered about?
I thought cleanliness was next to godliness.

-- 

--JB                                 All we learn from history is that
                                       we learn nothing from history.