Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!genrad!grkermi!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646
From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: science and social science
Message-ID: <1310015@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Jun-85 01:15:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.1310015
Posted: Tue Jun 11 01:15:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Jun-85 01:32:29 EDT
References: <814@gloria.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 6

>/* colonel@gloria.UUCP (Col. G. L. Sicherman) / 10:06 am  Jun  9, 1985 */

>If being wrong is a symptom of not being a science, social science
>qualifies easily.

No.  Only many social SCIENTISTS.