Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!genrad!grkermi!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646
From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Social sciences & subjective experience
Message-ID: <1310017@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Jun-85 13:44:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.1310017
Posted: Tue Jun 11 13:44:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Jun-85 00:27:33 EDT
References: <87@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 10

>/* flink@umcp-cs.UUCP (Paul V. Torek) /  3:39 pm  Jun  9, 1985 */

>It seems to limit psychology drastically.  I think your comment (>>>)
>was an overstatement at best.  For one thing, I think it may in principle
>be possible to explain/correlate subjective experience with neurobiological
>events.

It may be possible and then again it may not be.  Personally, I expect that
certain psychological phenomena are accompanied by certain physical phenomena.
But my beliefs don't qualify as science.