Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcnoa!dat
From: dat@hpcnoa.UUCP (dat)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <93000001@hpcnoa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Jun-85 14:06:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpcnoa.93000001
Posted: Mon Jun 10 14:06:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Jun-85 00:25:57 EDT
References: <-171800@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Fort Collins, CO
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:decwrl:-171800:hpcnoa:93000001:37777777600:556
Nf-From: hpcnoa!dat    Jun  5 10:06:00 1985



	Something that's always bothered me about burials and such
is the waste of some of the most lovely land in the world.

	In the local area there are some really nice park areas
that are taken up by tombstones and (presumably) lots of bones
in wood boxes.

	Wouldn't it make more sense to bury people straight 
into the ground and then utilize the area as a parkland?  

	When I die I want to be buried at the foot of a tree or 
something - I am very much against having a 'hallowed' ground where 
my body is entrenched.

	Comments?

					--- Dave Taylor