Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bonnie.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!emh From: emh@bonnie.UUCP (Edward M. Hummel) Newsgroups: net.physics Subject: Re: Left, Right, and Mirrors Message-ID: <495@bonnie.UUCP> Date: Fri, 7-Jun-85 19:29:14 EDT Article-I.D.: bonnie.495 Posted: Fri Jun 7 19:29:14 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Jun-85 03:52:10 EDT References: <235@sask.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany NJ Lines: 27 >An interesting, related bit of trivia is the fact that "left" and >"right" are concepts which can only be communicated among two >parties if both parties can "see" each other. In other words, if >we ever contact an alien civilization which is so far away that we >can communicate with them only by radio, and there is no astronomical >object which both we and they can view, then we would have no way to >tell them what we mean by "left" as opposed to "right"--or, for that >matter, how to tell the north pole of a magnet from the south pole. Parity violation in the weak interactions has been known to exist since the mid-1950s. (Yang, Lee, Wu, et al.) Just tell your alien to measure the spin of any neutrino he has handy. All neutrinos in the universe seem to be "left-handed" (helicity=-1; spin counter-clockwise as they travel away from you; etc.). All anti-neutrinos seem to be "right-handed". This certainly gives you a way to define "clockwise" as opposed to "counterclockwise", or "left" as opposed to "right". Well, you ask, how can I be sure he is looking at a neutrino and not an antineutrino? CP violation has been around since 1964. (Cronin, Fitch, Christenson, et al.) Just tell your alien to study the decay of neutral K mesons. By comparing results you can unambiguously define the particle K0, as opposed to its antiparticle, K0-bar. This gives you a way to define "matter" vs. "antimatter", and thus neutrinos vs. antineutrinos. I haven't read Gardner's book so I can't comment on what he intended. Ed Hummel