Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unccvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!unccvax!dsi
From: dsi@unccvax.UUCP (Dataspan Inc)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: Possibly poor control?
Message-ID: <219@unccvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Jun-85 10:16:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: unccvax.219
Posted: Thu Jun 20 10:16:41 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Jun-85 02:30:36 EDT
References: <2784@decwrl.UUCP>
Organization: UNC-Charlotte
Lines: 9


    I agree with you 100 %... I was just interested in the architecture of
the alleged circuit that the subject could allegedly will. Regardless of
the topology, and decent first-semester signal processing student could
(or should) be able to show at least N ways that the circuit is indeed not
a random state device...

David
.