Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!fagin
From: fagin@ucbvax.ARPA (Barry Steven Fagin)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Red plot foiled at govt. agency (OSHA)
Message-ID: <7835@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 5-Jun-85 14:54:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.7835
Posted: Wed Jun  5 14:54:15 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 05:50:10 EDT
References: <466@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <198@ttrdc.UUCP> <558@cybvax0.UUCP>
Reply-To: fagin@ucbvax.UUCP (Barry Steven Fagin)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 32

In article <558@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes:
>In article <198@ttrdc.UUCP> mjk@ttrdc.UUCP (Mike Kelly) writes:
>> 
>>  >From: carnes@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP (Richard Carnes)
>>  >Let us have [trumpets, please] the Libertarian Solution to the
>>  >problems of occupational risk.  And make sure it's a simple one.
>> 
>> If you die from toxic exposure at your job, you won't work for that guy
>> anymore.  Eventually he'll kill enough people to drive himself out of
>> business.  You gotta admit, it *is* simple....
>
>Isn't it strange then that people are still contracting black lung in
>coal mines and brown lung in cotton mills, as they have for centuries.
>
>Except that the incidence has gone down since OSHA regulations were
>enacted.
>-- 
>
>Mike Huybensz		...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh

Will someone out there who disagrees with the libertarian position on job
safety AND WHO HAS READ ONE OR MORE OF OUR POSTINGS addressing the issue
please discuss it, if you are so inclined?  The kind of strawman nonsense
shown above accomplishes nothing.

(My apologies if the postings haven't reached your site yet)

--Barry


-- 
Barry Fagin @ University of California, Berkeley