Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646
From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Freedom of Speech and Assembly in Public vs Private Property
Message-ID: <2380041@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 19-Jun-85 16:42:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.2380041
Posted: Wed Jun 19 16:42:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Jun-85 01:09:41 EDT
References: <656@whuxl.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 19

>/* orb@whuxl.UUCP (SEVENER) /  8:52 am  Jun 18, 1985 */

>In fact, the shopping malls owner's
>ejection of leafletters and others espousing viewpoints s/he doesn't like 
>is simply a discriminatory ban of part of the public, not the public as 
>a whole, nor the protection of any right of privacy.

Do you exclude the public as a whole from your place of residence, or
only a part of it?
 
>In fact, fortunately some Courts in New Jersey have ruled that malls
>can *not* ban free speech or leafletting since they are indeed
>public places regardless of their nominal private ownership.

Will you think it fortunate when the courts declare that 1+1=3?

>                              tim sevener  whuxl!orb

						Mike Sykoa