Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site hammer.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!hammer!seifert
From: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian,net.religion
Subject: Re: Biblical Scholarships reply to Dan Boskovich - Objective Evidence...
Message-ID: <1298@hammer.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Jun-85 10:14:09 EDT
Article-I.D.: hammer.1298
Posted: Tue Jun  4 10:14:09 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 08:37:33 EDT
References: <612@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Reply-To: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 27
Xref: watmath net.religion.christian:764 net.religion:7046
Summary: 

In article <612@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> gary@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (gary w buchholz) writes:

>  1) What Dan has presented here has alreday been written and
>published by Josh McDowell in two works - Evidence that demands
>a Verdict;  Further Evidence that Demands a Verdict.

I believe that the "liar, lunatic, or Lord" argument actually
comes from C.S. Lewis.  (And presented, with credits, in Josh's
works.)  I agree that Dan should have given credit to the people
he got his material from.

>  Dans (and/or McDowells) work is
>therefore a work of edification written by believers for believers
>even though it pretends to objective scholarship.

Actually, Josh McDowell thought that Christians were crazy.
(Perhaps not unlike certain persons who occasionally post here)
He set out to disprove Christianity.  But the evidence turned him
around and he became a Christian.

Snoopy
tektronix!mako!seifert

"Only visiting this planet"
	-Larry Norman

(unless Martin Luther beat him to that one also. Doretta?)