Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!grkermi!genrad!decvax!mcnc!duke!nlt From: nlt@duke.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion.christian Subject: Re: AP Bias or Error? Message-ID: <5925@duke.UUCP> Date: Wed, 12-Jun-85 11:58:17 EDT Article-I.D.: duke.5925 Posted: Wed Jun 12 11:58:17 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Jun-85 01:24:24 EDT Organization: Duke University Lines: 42 Bob Brown posts the following AP news article and asks for comments. My article is being posted to net.religion.christian only, and I suggest that any further discussion on the topic be confined to n.r.c, as opposed to net.religion. > MODERATE BAPTISTS MAY BE READY TO DUMP > STANLEY > >"The election in Dallas next week will climax a fierce campaign >launched by moderates who claim Stanley, pastor of First Baptist >Church in Atlanta, is leading a conservative effort to force its >ideology - THAT EVERY WORD in the Bible must be interpreted LITER- >ALLY - on all Southern Baptist agencies and seminaries." It is hard to make a judgement based on a single paragraph of text, but yes, the reporter's statement is misleading. The issue is not literal interpretation, but inerrancy. The conservative position in the denomination is that every word in the Bible is there because God wanted it there, and thus every assertion in the Bible is accurate. (Note that even most conservative thinkers allow for the actual wording to have been in accordance with the human author's own style of writing. Very few view the authors as mere dictating machines.) The "moderate" position claims a stronger human influence on the writing of the Bible, stating that since imperfect human beings, living in an imperfect human culture, with incomplete knowledge, wrote the Bible, some of the biases and mistaken notions held by these authors and their cultures may have found their way into Biblical writings. Nevertheless, the moderates would say, the Bible was written by men of God and records, as accurately as possible given the limitations of human knowledge, their experiences of God. It is incorrect to describe conservatives as insisting upon the literal interpretation of every word in the Bible; any reasonable approach to reading the Bible will recognize the use of metaphors, figures of speech, and so forth. (For the record, although I am not a Baptist now, I grew up in a Southern Baptist church and family, and I have been following the moderate-conservative feud fairly closely. My own views are close to the "moderate" position as described above.) N. L. Tinkham (duke!nlt)