Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!quiroz
From: quiroz@rochester.UUCP (Cesar Quiroz)
Newsgroups: net.rumor
Subject: Re: Any news about the reputed bomb explosion in the UCB CS Dept?
Message-ID: <10087@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Jun-85 16:46:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocheste.10087
Posted: Thu Jun  6 16:46:12 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Jun-85 02:13:43 EDT
References: <1457@utah-gr.UUCP> <8@ucbcad.UUCP> <157@jendeh.UUCP> <43@avsdS.UUCP>
Reply-To: quiroz@rochester.UUCP (Cesar Quiroz)
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 37

From article <43@avsdS.UUCP> (cdk@avsdS.UUCP (Chris Kendall)):
(When responding to an article by Arash Farmanfarmaian)
>
>  Sorry .... I just couldn't let this one slide!!!!!!!!
>As a matter of fact, I had to read this garbage 3 times to really
>believe Mr. Farmanfarmaian had the gall and stupidity to say that!

	    Certainly, the original wasn't without serious flaws.  I
couldn't understand its lack of sensibility: that in some regions of the
world a mindless bombing more doesn't qualify as news is no reason to 
complain when other people still display concern about it.  Attributing
it (even as a possibility) to boredom is just stupid.  So, Mr. Kendall,
you had good reasons to flame.  Too bad you showed your own personal
inadequacies in your also stupid response:

>I too am an engineering instructor... (evening classes), and have been
>for over 6 years.  It has been my experience that anyone who can pass
>a class without coming is either:
>               1. wasting everyone elses time by even 
                                    ^^^^^
>                  enrolling since they've had the class before
>                   --or--
>               2. Cheating they're asses off.
                            ^^^^^^^
>My experience has been with inner city students, out of city students,
>outer country students, outer space students. I may be a bit biased 
>but it has been noted that students that do not have complete command
>of our language tend to fall in category 2!

            Do instructors (pretended or otherwise) who don't have
complete command of *their* language also fall under category 2?
Keep your prejudices to yourself.

>
>               C. Kendall

Cesar Quiroz