Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!ron
From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>)
Newsgroups: net.rumor
Subject: Re: How hep is the HEP
Message-ID: <11295@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 18-Jun-85 00:28:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.11295
Posted: Tue Jun 18 00:28:24 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 20-Jun-85 20:09:29 EDT
References: <1530001@acf4.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 14

> 
>   Is there any truth to the rumor that Denelcor has asked Stanford Univ.
> to perform an evaluation on their top-of-the-line HEP-2 machine???  If so,
> does anyone know how it has faired, or how it's fairing?
> 
As owner of one of the few HEP-1 machines, I wish they'd get around to
finishing the HEP-1.  The machine is utterly useless.

Denelcor peddled the HEP to various universities and finally got Georgia
to bite.  However, the university quickly realized what a dog it was and
they decided to send the machine back rather than pay or write any software
for it.

-Ron