Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!columbia!topaz!MURPH%MAINE.BITNET@WISCVM.ARPA
From: MURPH%MAINE.BITNET@WISCVM.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Stephen King
Message-ID: <2304@topaz.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 18-Jun-85 01:51:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.2304
Posted: Tue Jun 18 01:51:43 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 20-Jun-85 20:49:46 EDT
Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 11

From: MURPH%MAINE.BITNET@WISCVM.ARPA  (M.A. Murphy)

Since someone already answered the query about the King/Bachman picture
discrepancy, I shall avoid duplication.

I would like to say that Stephen King does not look, in person, quite like
his representation on Am. Express commercials.  Make up can do wonders...
Not to say that he is ugly, but he does look a lot better on the commercials
than when I have seen him walking his dog.  Maybe it's because his dog is
ugly...  and that just detracts from King himself.  Oh well.  Now you all
know that Stephen King has an ugly dog...