Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekmdp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!teklds!azure!tekmdp!edm
From: edm@tekmdp.UUCP (Ed Morin)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: New topic: It's over when...
Message-ID: <17@tekmdp.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Jun-85 14:32:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekmdp.17
Posted: Mon Jun  3 14:32:52 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Jun-85 04:46:50 EDT
References: <2681@cca.UUCP> <3761@alice.UUCP> <1159@uwmacc.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 32
Xref: tektronix net.singles:07595 

> In article <3761@alice.UUCP> sdh@alice.UUCP (Steve Hawley) writes:
> >You know its over when you realize that you love (him/her) but are not IN love
> >with (him/her).
> >
> >Figure that one out.
> >
> >Steve Hawley
> >(allegra,research)!alice!sdh
> 
>    And if anybody CAN figure it out, let me know... it's how one of my
> relationships ended.
> 
> -- 
>  - jvop
> 
> {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!oyster

I too just had a relationship end April 24 (@ 11:00pm PDT) this way. The
beginning of the end started out when "(almost) all we could talk about
was the relationship".  After about 2 weeks I finally discovered that
the differences in life goals, etc. that we had really didn't matter as
much as the fact that I had an "US" attitude in my approach to our life
but she only had a "ME" attitude in her approach to her life that didn't
include me.  She loves me very much, but not enough to include me "in"
her life to the extent that her attitude is about "US".

I hope this all makes sense.  It sure is crystal clear to me right now...

					Ed Morin
					tektronix!edm@tekmdp

/* Absolutely nothing witty to say... */