Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall
From: edhall@randvax.UUCP (Ed Hall)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: dancing, but not really, #2
Message-ID: <2520@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Jun-85 23:12:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: randvax.2520
Posted: Mon Jun  3 23:12:28 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Jun-85 01:51:52 EDT
References: <ut-sally.1988> <296@unc.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 19

> Most of the human-relations books (such as the one you [Pooh] are quoting)
> assume the reader is a liberal, college-educated yuppie type.
> 
> What are the more inarticulate people expected to do in these circumstances?
> 
> 	Frank Silbermann

Does anyone else find this sort of tone offensively elitist?  Some of
the very *worst* communicators on an emotional level are ``college-
educated yuppie types.''  They (not *all* yuppies) have so many
expectations and theories as to what their relationships *should*
be like that they often can't see their own feelings clearly, much
less their partner's.

You don't have to study Keats or Shakespeare to know how to say ``I love
you''.

		-Ed Hall
		decvax!randvax!edhall