Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!hplabs!hao!woods From: woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Intelligence Message-ID: <1588@hao.UUCP> Date: Sat, 8-Jun-85 20:08:49 EDT Article-I.D.: hao.1588 Posted: Sat Jun 8 20:08:49 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 14:26:34 EDT References: <377@boulder.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO Lines: 34 > > It seems to me that *any* selection criteria that eliminates 98% > >of the candidates is self-defeating. > > I must disagree, Greg; I would say that I am probably just as fussy > as the person (I don't know who that was) in the first quote. Sure enough, > that makes it hard to find people, but bad experiences with the wrong people > can make it even harder. Well, I suppose my statement is also a bit too generalized, because ultimately most of us want to eliminate 99.9999999% of the population (i.e. all but one). But scores on an IQ test seems like such an *arbitrary* criterion for eliminating 98% of the available possibilities before even *meeting* them. I still think that's taking the "selection" process a long way overboard. Essentially, it is a case of making up one's mind about someone without even giving them a chance. It is quite likely to lead to passing over some very good potential mates, and for what? So he can be right about how smart he is? Seems dumb to me. > I have found that > most of the truly intelligent women I meet are at work, since there are a lot > of women who go into atmospheric sciences. But that is not a good place to be > looking for romance, so I am at a loss. Why not, Jon? I know two people who are getting married this summer who met at NCAR. Sounds like yet another arbitrary advanced elimination criteria to me. At least consider the possibility that you are closing yourself off from some potentially rewarding relationships. --Greg -- {ucbvax!hplabs | allegra!nbires | decvax!noao | harpo!seismo | ihnp4!noao} !hao!woods CSNET: woods@NCAR ARPA: woods%ncar@CSNET-RELAY