Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peora.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!petsd!peora!bd
From: bd@peora.UUCP (Bernie Dougan)
Newsgroups: net.motss,net.nlang,net.social,net.singles
Subject: Re: term for SO's relatives
Message-ID: <1060@peora.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Jun-85 16:47:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: peora.1060
Posted: Wed Jun 12 16:47:55 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Jun-85 00:30:35 EDT
References: <674@ptsfa.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Perkin-Elmer SDC, Orlando, Fl.
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.motss:1757 net.nlang:3160 net.social:652 net.singles:7285

> If relations through marriage are "in-laws" how about calling
> relations through cohabitation "out-laws".

I thought "out-laws" was the term for "in-laws" after the divorce.
-- 
     Bernie Dougan
     Perkin-Elmer Southern Development Center
     2486 Sand Lake Road
     Orlando, Florida 32809
     (305)850-1040
     {decvax!ucf-cs, ihnp4!pesnta, vax135!petsd}!peora!bd