Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site sjuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!sjuvax!jss
From: jss@sjuvax.UUCP (J. Shapiro)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Re: Intelligence
Message-ID: <1174@sjuvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Jun-85 00:16:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: sjuvax.1174
Posted: Fri Jun 14 00:16:27 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Jun-85 07:02:02 EDT
References: <378@boulder.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Haverford College, Haverford, Pa.
Lines: 9

Has anyone out there noted yet that the standardized IQ tests test only for
a particular kind of logic, and that such tests are invalid for many of
the testees - the fact that your logic and the test's logic do not agree
does not render you stupid.

Also, IQ tests are only as good as the people who make them up. They are
probably not valid much over the median IQ of the testwriters.  Would all
IQ test writers with an IQ of 200 please raise your hand?