Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watnot.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!grwalter
From: grwalter@watnot.UUCP (Fred)
Newsgroups: net.social,net.singles
Subject: Re: techies attracting "classy" women
Message-ID: <11222@watnot.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Jun-85 18:48:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: watnot.11222
Posted: Tue Jun 18 18:48:35 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Jun-85 03:07:56 EDT
References: <253@unc.UUCP> <270@looking.UUCP> <371@h-sc1.UUCP>
Reply-To: grwalter@watnot.UUCP (Fred)
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.social:685 net.singles:7389
Summary: 

In article <2540@wateng.UUCP> jamcmullan@wateng.UUCP (Judy McMullan) writes:
>> Judging from the complaining I read in this newsgroup, I believe that
>> techies do NOT such have an easy time attracting "classy" women.
>> 
>> 	Frank Silbermann
>
>Awww... Never mind those "classy" women -- concentrate on us hacks!!  :-)
>
>		--Judy McMullan

Why the :-) ? All the female hacks I know are classy ...

 (They are also highly intelligent, usually more so than I. Oh well,
  that's life. :-))

Fred

P.S. does anybody out there have a good definition of "classy" ?
     I find it's always a good idea to know what a compliment 
     means before you use it :-)

UUCP  : {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra|clyde}!watmath!watnot!grwalter
CSNET : grwalter%watnot@waterloo.csnet
ARPA  : grwalter%watnot%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa