Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!unc!fsks From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Intelligence (mild flame) Message-ID: <463@unc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 17-Jun-85 12:42:51 EDT Article-I.D.: unc.463 Posted: Mon Jun 17 12:42:51 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 19-Jun-85 03:56:16 EDT References: <228@tove.UUCP> Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill Lines: 24 Summary: /* fsks@unc.UUCP / 12:02 pm Jun 14, 1985 */ >>I agree. Of course some people in this group (hint, hint, Greg and Dana) >>believe that preparing for social encounters is a waste of time, and that >>we should just "be spontaneous." In article mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora) writes: >I believe that they feel it is a waste of time to prepare for _SPECIFIC_ >instances and particular situations, but not that it is a waste of time to >improve one's sociability in a _GENERAL_ way. Exactly how does one go about doing that? When I studied German and Dutch, I took more than one approach. True, I did study _GENERAL_ concepts, such as grammar and vocabulary. But these would not have been as effective without additional drill using canned conversations dealing with _SPECIFIC_ topics and situations. Most textbooks use this approach. For many years, "small talk" was a foreign language to me. It seemed natural to apply the techniques I used when learning other foreign languages, including practice drills. Doesn't that make sense? Frank Silbermann