Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watmath.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!dfjmccarthy From: dfjmccarthy@watmath.UUCP (Darryl McCarthy) Newsgroups: net.sport.hockey Subject: Re: Re: NHL rule change Message-ID: <15198@watmath.UUCP> Date: Thu, 20-Jun-85 17:27:41 EDT Article-I.D.: watmath.15198 Posted: Thu Jun 20 17:27:41 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 20-Jun-85 23:49:21 EDT References: <1576@dciem.UUCP> <8235@ucbvax.ARPA> <552@alberta.UUCP> <8314@ucbvax.ARPA> Reply-To: dfjmccarthy@watmath.UUCP (Darryl McCarthy) Distribution: net Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 36 In article <8314@ucbvax.ARPA> citrin@ucbvax.UUCP (Wayne Citrin) writes: > ...a flaw in the rules. Penalties exist to prevent > a team from doing certain things, not to encourage them to do those > things. The new rule removes the encouragement by removing the advantage > that good-skating teams would gain by deliberately breaking the rules. Your right this rule will discourage the good-skating teams from breaking the rules (if that's what their doing now). But your not looking at the other side ofthe coin, the poor-skating teams are NOW encouraged to deliberately break the rules by sending one of their worst players on to the ice to, as you say, provoke a penalty against a Gretzky. So now they've gotten rid of a great player, while they're only losing a so-so player while still staying 5-5. Therefore they are really gaining the advantage. > >I think that this is a fairly compelling argument. It's not an attack on the >Oilers, who found a flaw in the rules and used it to their advantage (as did >the Canadiens, who used to spend a great deal of time practicing the 4-on-4). >It's just an attempt to plug a hole in the rules of hockey. The hole that they tried to plug has only been enlarged because of the many poor-skating teams that will take advantage of this rule. >Wayne Citrin >(ucbvax!citrin) -- Darryl McCarthy University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario (I also have no clever lines)