Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 +MMDF+MULTI+2.11; site icdoc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!mcvax!ukc!icdoc!iwm
From: iwm@icdoc.UUCP (Ian Moor)
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers,net.tv
Subject: Re: SPACE 1999. - You can't defend it
Message-ID: <217@ivax.icdoc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Jun-85 05:10:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: ivax.217
Posted: Fri Jun 14 05:10:55 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Jun-85 01:29:40 EDT
References: <2051@topaz.ARPA> <576@west44.kcl-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: iwm@icdoc.UUCP (Ian Moor)
Organization: Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lines: 22
Xref: watmath net.sf-lovers:8019 net.tv:3000
Xpath: icdoc ivax

In article <468@ttidcc.UUCP> hollombe@ttidcc.UUCP (The Polymath) writes:
>the  most  incongruities  and  logical flaws.  Two of my favorites were the
>never-ending supplies of people and "Eagle" space  craft.  They  seemed  to
>loose  at  least  one  and  usually  several  of each every episode without
>creating any shortages, or even much concern.

Not that I am defending Space 1949 but ...
What about the never-ending supply of security officers on the Enterprise
(the ones at the tail end of the group that got grabbed zapped or whatever..
and the other one "Smith go back and find out what happened to Jones"

Is it true that a ship was reported at a range of 10 'microns' in
Battlestar pathetica ?


-- 
Ian W Moor
                                   The squire on the hippopotamus is equal
 Department of Computing           to the sons of the other two squires.
 180 Queensgate 
 London SW7 Uk.