Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site weitek.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!spar!turtlevax!weitek!robertp
From: robertp@weitek.UUCP (Robert Plamondon)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Discrimination
Message-ID: <217@weitek.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 7-Jun-85 13:03:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: weitek.217
Posted: Fri Jun  7 13:03:25 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Jun-85 03:17:16 EDT
References: <354@iham1.UUCP> <25954@lanl.ARPA> <2896@drutx.UUCP>, <715@burl.UUCP> <283@ihlpa.UUCP>
Organization: Weitek Corp. Sunnyvale Ca.
Lines: 13

> 	So back to my original question - should equally qualified people
> be promoted on the toss of the coin or on sex? I doubt that equally
> qualified people were chosen on the toss of the coin before.  So what
> criteria would you use to discriminate between two equally qualified
> people? 
> 
> Sharon Badian	ihnp4!mtgzz!seb

A duel to the death!

-- 
		-- Robert Plamondon
		   {ucbvax!dual!turtlevax,ihnp4!resonex}!weitek!robertp