Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!water!watdcsu!dmcanzi
From: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.women
Subject: Re: Alternative Action
Message-ID: <1463@watdcsu.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Jun-85 23:57:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: watdcsu.1463
Posted: Sun Jun  9 23:57:16 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Jun-85 22:11:13 EDT
References: <1447@watdcsu.UUCP> <214@weitek.UUCP>
Reply-To: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Distribution: net
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.politics:9351 net.women:5673
Summary: 

In article <214@weitek.UUCP> robertp@weitek.UUCP (Robert Plamondon) writes:
>Would *YOU* want to go to work for some company without ever having met your
>new supervisor or co-workers?  If you were hiring someone to work closely
>with you, would you hire an obnoxious twit with good credentials, when you
>could find someone more or less equally qualified whom you could get along
>with?

I hadn't thought of that, possibly because my job doesn't require
working closely with anybody else.  It certainly makes the process
of getting a job riskier, eg. I could end up having to work closely
with a cigar smoker or a born-again Christian...

*sigh*  Oh, well.  It *seemed* like a great idea.
--
David Canzi

If you can't answer a man's argument, all is not lost; you can still
call him vile names.  -- Plutarch