Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: (The CBC) Re: Nationalization/Crown Corps. - not really
Message-ID: <737@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 28-Jul-85 21:22:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: lsuc.737
Posted: Sun Jul 28 21:22:07 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 22:25:19 EDT
References: <300@looking.UUCP> <3283@garfield.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Distribution: can
Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
Lines: 23
Keywords: separate school funding
Summary: Including non-religious

In article <1183@ubc-cs.UUCP> robinson@ubc-cs.UUCP (Jim Robinson) writes:
>In article <724@lsuc.UUCP> jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura|Barrister Jimomura Solicitor|Toronto) writes:
>>
>>     Jim Robinson suggested that in light of the
>>Constitutional bar against religious discrimination,
>>funding for separate schools, if upheld should also
>>be available for other religions.
>> 
>>     I see no problem with this argument. 
>
>Wouldn't it  have to be available for non-religious private schools
>as well, since denying them funding would also constitute discrimination on
>the basis of religion ?
 
     As far as I can see, yes, it would be available
to *any* private school, depending probably on the
questions of quality of education, and I suppose
need (maybe need would be irrelevant--I've just
thought of it) and possibly in light of Zundel and
Keegstra, with the exclusion of teaching hatred.
-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura