Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!ucbvax!tcp-ip
From: tcp-ip@ucbvax.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: subnet addresses
Message-ID: <9476@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 11:35:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.9476
Posted: Tue Jul 30 11:35:44 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 06:34:26 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 9

From: "J. Noel Chiappa" <JNC@MIT-XX.ARPA>

	Mark, I don't understand what you think you are disputing.
It is perfectly legal for any network *without subnets* to have 0's in
any part of the 'rest' field. Nobody ever said otherwise. I was only
discussing the case where subnets *were* in use.

	Noel
-------