Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!jsq
From: jsq@ut-sally.UUCP (John Quarterman)
Newsgroups: mod.std.unix
Subject: Re: standardized error messages
Message-ID: <2580@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 4-Aug-85 14:21:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.2580
Posted: Sun Aug  4 14:21:06 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 5-Aug-85 17:52:33 EDT
References: <2391@ut-sally.UUCP> <2461@ut-sally.UUCP>
Reply-To: std-unix@ut-sally.UUCP
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 27
Approved: jsq@ut-sally.UUCP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Jul 85 00:34:17 mdt
From: seismo!cmcl2!lanl!unmvax!unmc!galway (Denis McKeon)
To: ut-sally!std-unix
Subject: Re: getopt standard reference

I don't have machine readable version of Hemenway & Armitage 
presentation, but their article in UNIX/World Vol. 1 No. 3
covers the choices, tradeoffs, & arguments well, and should be widely
available in the community. Perhaps U/w could post the copy?

dm


Denis McKeon, P.O. Box 4925, Albuquerque, NM 87196

    ~{convex,ucbvax,gatech,csu-cs,anl-mcs}!unmvax!unmc!galway
    ~{pur-ee!purdue,ucbvax!lbl-csam,philabs!cmcl2}!lanl!unmc!galway

------------------------------

Discussions-Of: UNIX standards, particularly the IEEE P1003 draft standard.
Submissions-To:	ut-sally!std-unix	or std-unix@ut-sally.ARPA
Comments-To: ut-sally!std-unix-request	or std-unix-request@ut-sally.ARPA
UUCP-Routes: {ihnp4,seismo,harvard,gatech}!ut-sally!std-unix
Archives-In: ~ftp/pub/mod.std.unix on ut-sally.ARPA (soon sally.UTEXAS.EDU)