Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site mit-vax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!think!mit-eddie!mit-vax!csdf
From: csdf@mit-vax.UUCP (Charles Forsythe)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Fetus = living organism (?????)
Message-ID: <390@mit-vax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Jul-85 14:18:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-vax.390
Posted: Tue Jul 16 14:18:04 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 04:29:47 EDT
References: <390@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA>
Reply-To: csdf@mit-vax.UUCP (Charles Forsythe)
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 29

In article Thomas Newton writes:
>It's become obvious that Rich Rosen doesn't know even basic high school
>biology, and when faced with it keeps repeating over and over
>
>        "the fetus is not alive, the fetus is not alive"
>
>Trying to convince him otherwise is like trying to convince one of the early
>religious fanatics that the Earth orbits the Sun, and not vice versa.  There
>is nothing that will make him change his mind; certainly the facts haven't.
>
>                                        -- Thomas Newton

It's become obvious that Thomas Newton doesn't know even basic high school
social responsibility, and when faced with it keeps repeating over and over

	"the fetus is human, the fetus is human"

Trying to convince him otherwise is like trying to convince one of the
early religious fanatics that women are people with rights.  There is
nothing that will make him change his mind; certainly the facts haven't.



-- 
Charles Forsythe
CSDF@MIT-VAX
"Don't get bogged down with details, just eat
     the stupid peice of paper."
        -Rev. Wang Zeep