Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-spice.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-spice!tdn
From: tdn@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA (Thomas Newton)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: \"Words mean what I pay them to mean . . .\"
Message-ID: <396@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 25-Jul-85 13:41:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-s.396
Posted: Thu Jul 25 13:41:21 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 27-Jul-85 02:14:16 EDT
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 17

>> What the hell does any of this have to do with the topic?

Why don't you ask your good friend csdf?  He's the one who claimed that it is
a matter of "nature" that we can't keep a two-month fetus alive outside of the
womb today.  If you don't want to see my replies to silly arguments, tell your
friend not to post them in the first place.

>> The point is that it's a woman's right to remove things from her body that
>> she doesn't want inside of it.

Obviously, everyone doesn't believe that this applies to unborn babies or else
there would be no abortion debate.  And if you do believe so strongly in this
premise, why did you spend so much time trying to convince us of a falsehood
("the fetus is not alive") instead of addressing the main issues?

                                        -- Thomas Newton
                                           Thomas.Newton@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA