Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site SCIRTP.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!mcnc!rti-sel!SCIRTP!todd From: todd@SCIRTP.UUCP (Todd Jones) Newsgroups: net.abortion,net.legal,net.women Subject: Is Abortion Murder? yes and no. Message-ID: <251@SCIRTP.UUCP> Date: Fri, 26-Jul-85 18:57:41 EDT Article-I.D.: SCIRTP.251 Posted: Fri Jul 26 18:57:41 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 09:13:26 EDT Distribution: net Organization: SCI Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC Lines: 34 Xref: linus net.abortion:1475 net.legal:1534 net.women:6249 I am curious as to fellow-netters thoughts on the following: If abortion is to be considered murder, the following must be objectively true: The fetus, in any or all of its stages, must be a human life, distinct from the mother. If the fetus is not a human life, distinct from the life of the mother, abortion cannot be considered murder since it then would not be the taking of a human life. Scientists, despite Jesse Helm's assertions, will never be able to prove that a fetus, in any stage, is a HUMAN life since the concept of humanness is not biologically defined. While no reasonable argument could contend that a post-birth homo-sapiens is human, endless, and unproveable, discussion about the humanity of in utero homo-sapiens will always exist. I contend the determination of the "humanity" of a fetus and its separation (as a human entity) from the mother are issues that are basically, spiritual (read religious) and therefore are not subject to governmental ruling. Each individual considering an abortion must come to grips with their own concept of fetal humanity and their decision to elect or refuse an abortion should be respected by ALL persons regardless of their personal views. ||||||| || || [ O-O ] Todd Jones \ ^ / {decvax,akgua}!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!todd | ~ | |___| SCI Systems Inc. doesn't necessarily agree with Todd.